| ANU Home | Search ANU | Directories | Schools & Faculties | Map | Teaching and Learning Home
The Australian National University
Teaching and Learning@ANU
Teaching and Learning@ANU
Printer Friendly Version of this Document

ANU Student Ratings of Courses and Teaching

This page contains links to summaries of the student evaluation of courses, lecturing (using a 'large group teaching' form) and tutoring/demonstrating ('small group teaching' form). Tables are divided according to the form type used: course (C), lecturing (A), and tutoring (B). The data within the tables are aggregated by College, level (first/later year or honours/postgraduate) and class size.

The forms used to collect the data were last revised in semester 2, 2003. New questions were added to the course evaluation form and some were deleted from all the forms. To keep the data up to date, only data from the last three years has been included the 'current' dataset.

Please choose the most appropriate link from the list below.

Ratings Interpretation Guidelines: Summary Tables for Current Versions of the ANUSET Forms

 

Undergraduate

Graduate and 4th Year/Honours

Older ANUSET data

2004 - 2006

2003-2005

 

2002-2004

 

2000-2003

1995-2002

More detail on the data

Surveys with less than 5 respondents were excluded from these tables. In addition, to increase the reliability of the figures, more than 4 surveys were necessary in any single category for the figures to be presented. Note that the means are aggregated by courses rather than by students. An implication of this is that courses with small enrolments and those with large enrolments contribute equally to the calculations. In addition, the data was screened using a variety of processes to increase its reliability and validity; for example, duplicate surveys were searched for and eliminated.

More detail on the forms

The major research streams that the ANUSET system is based on are the SEEQ (Marsh & Dunkin, 1992) and CEQ (Ramsden, 1991). These both have extensive theoretical and empirical underpinnings spanning at least two decades. In addition to the research literature and interest group input, the form development process has included the following: the forms were redesigned in light of student comments, response patterns were analysed to detect redundant items, there was input from professional form designers, teaching staff gave feedback on draft forms, and the forms were piloted on groups of ANU students.

References

Marsh, H. W., and Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: A Multidimensional Perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. J. C. Smart. New York, Agathon. VIII: 143 - 233.

Ramsden, P. 1991, A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the Course Experience Questionnaire, Studies in Higher Education, 16:129.