Genetically engineered soy beans: The cereal threat

Argument

The introduction of genetically engineered foods has important implications on a global scale. The introduction of any new technology, especially in the field of genetics, will result in changes to all aspects of culture; social, environmental, political, legal, economic, and health. In this essay I will outline some of these changes and thus show the importance of public awareness, understanding and participation in the introduction of this new technology.

Genetically engineered foods (GEF)

Genetically engineered foods are a subset, relating to food, of the genetically modified organisms (GMO) group. GMOs are any live organism which have had their genetic constituents altered or modified directly. GMOs may obtain genetic material from unrelated species for example, human to pig, which makes it different to traditional breeding techniques. Molecular biology is the basis for this technology.

The sorts of GEFs that currently exist include, tomatoes which suppress the gene for cell wall breakdown (Flavr Savr), plants which excrete biopesticides and many micro-organisms involved in fermentation processes.

Future possibilities are almost endless due to the largely untapped wealth of genetic materials in the environment.

The uniqueness of soybeans

Monsanto's introduction of "Round Up Ready" soybeans are unique in several ways. Firstly, the beans are engineered to be resistant to a common herbicide in wide usage that the company itself makes. Secondly, soybeans are one of 9 crops that account for 75% of the world's food supply (FAO). Thirdly, soybeans are indigenous to Asia and have a long cultural, social and ecological background.

Top


Australian GenEthics Network

Return to MSc in Science Communications page


Health Implications

human and environmental

Legal Implications

Intellectual property GATT/TRIPS

Food labelling, seed saving and ownership. Allowable residues

Substantial equivalence vs Novelty

Environmental Implications

Biodiversity

Traditional ecological knowledge

Conventional/Organic farming

Political implications

power, Freedom, choice

Developing Nations

Economic implications

capitalism, distribution, efficiency

Market failure

Social Implications

Social diversity, Maturity

values

The role of multinationals, government, non government and community

monopolies, centralism

pluralism, activism

education, discussion and involvement.

Top

References

American Chemical Society (ACS) Symposium series "Genetically Modified Foods; Safety Issues", ACS, ed. Engel et.al., 1995

Calestous, Juma "The Gene Hunters; Biotechnology and the scramble for seeds", 1989.

Genetics Forum, "The case against patents in genetic engineering", The Genetics Forum, London, 1996.

P97 gene tech food rules A328 draft standards for RoundUp in soybeans, Australia and New Zealand Food Authority, 1997.

Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) "Biodiversity, biotechnology, and sustainable development in health and agriculture: emerging connections", PAHO, Washington, 1996.

Perlas, Nicanor, "Overcoming illusions about biotechnology", Third World Network, Penang, 1994.

Scrinis, Gyorgy "Colonising the seed; Genetic Engineering and Techno-Industrial Agriculture", Friends of the Earth, Melbourne, 1995.

United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), "Our Planet", UNEP, vol.8, No.4, 1996.

Williams, N., Banes, G., "Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Wisdom for sustainable development", Centre for Resource and Environmental Science (CRES), Canberra, 1996.

Top