I would also wonder the format of the test giving. Was it done on
computer? Think about your own experience in using a keyboard vs writing
with a pen on paper. The environment changes how you think about what you
are doing, at least it does for me, and my handwriting is pretty well shot
as well by now. But I'm one really good typist!
Lastly, if the instruction for drill and practice was 'pick the answer' vs
'fill in the blank out of your own head' the results of the research will
be suspect. ETS is usually pretty good at these types of controls,
though, so I doubt that is the problem. But again, one can't tell unless
looking at the actual instruments used in the study.
Before generalising anything from this study in our local media, I hope
someone takes a close look at what was really done. The point about
teaching training was important, but based on personal experience and an
aversion to much of any educational research because of the complex
factors involved, I suspect things aren't as simple as the story would
suggest. But the headline sure grabs attention, doesn't it?
Cheers,
Jan
Jan Whitaker
JLWhitaker Associates \--------/ - jwhit@primenet.com
Edu/Comm Technology Consultant ---/ - Video and Internet Specialities
Melbourne, VIC, Australia \----/ - http://www.primenet.com/~jwhit/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Business and Professional Women Melbourne Club: http://www.bpw.asn.au
Board member: Electronic Frontiers Australia: http://www.efa.org.au