[LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?
From: Patrick Corliss (patrick@quad.net.au)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 00:27:08 EST
- Next message: wowro01: "[LINK] ¸Å´Ï¾Æ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÇʼöÁ¤º¸[±¤°í]"
- Previous message: Å«Áñ°Å¿ò: "[LINK] [±¤°í]Áý¿¡ µ·³ª¹« ±æ·¯º¸¼¼¿ä ÀßÀÚ¶ó¿"
- In reply to: Jonathon Padfield: "Re: [LINK] ABC Catalyst Tonight: 'Internet Meltdown'"
- Next in thread: Peter Hughes: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Peter Hughes: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Adam Todd: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Rachel Polanskis: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Tony Barry: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Carl Makin: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Roger Clarke: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Gliddon, Josh: "RE: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Chirgwin, Richard: "RE: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Patrick Corliss: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Dr. Bob Jansen: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:23:01 +1100, Jonathon Padfield wrote:
Re: [LINK] ABC Catalyst Tonight: 'Internet Meltdown'
> Interestingly they did point out that the 95% of PC's connected to the
> internet constituted a monoculture, specifically a Microsoft
> monoculture, that made large scale worms such as Code-Red possible.
> Unfortunatly they didn't point out any alternatives or that the
> alternatives that do exist were unworried by the day-to-day effects of
> such a monoculture.
Hi Jon
I know all you nice people use Linux and stuff unlike my M$ Windows 98, but I
wonder do we have any Apple users here and if so, what are their thoughts?
Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?
Some (many?) people I know would switch if they had the chance, imo.
Regards
Patrick Corliss
- Next message: wowro01: "[LINK] ¸Å´Ï¾Æ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÇʼöÁ¤º¸[±¤°í]"
- Previous message: Å«Áñ°Å¿ò: "[LINK] [±¤°í]Áý¿¡ µ·³ª¹« ±æ·¯º¸¼¼¿ä ÀßÀÚ¶ó¿"
- In reply to: Jonathon Padfield: "Re: [LINK] ABC Catalyst Tonight: 'Internet Meltdown'"
- Next in thread: Peter Hughes: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Peter Hughes: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Adam Todd: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Rachel Polanskis: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Tony Barry: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Carl Makin: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Roger Clarke: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Gliddon, Josh: "RE: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Chirgwin, Richard: "RE: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Reply: Patrick Corliss: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Maybe reply: Dr. Bob Jansen: "Re: [LINK] Apple Users -- Not so good, good, great, perfect etc?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1
: Sun Mar 31 2002 - 03:10:03 EST