At 10:45 AM +1030 on 1/3/02, Doug Jacquier wrote:
>http://www.worldcongress2002.org/public/get_involved.asp, which does not
>rely on flash and is accessible to most browsers. Please give us a
>second chance, list members, and have another go at getting involved.
With my text only browser this URL redirects me to
http://www.worldcongress2002.org/flash_sniff.htm which produces a
blank page!
Opening it in iCab I find it opens two windows. One with the URL
above which invites you to download flash but it does not appear to
display anything if you use a text only browser. Even "Ga Away!"
would be better than a blank screen.
The second, which is very slow, being full of graphics and complex
tables to achieve graphical rather than useful effects. My browser,
iCab, has a feature which checks the validity of the HTML code. Its
report on this page is -
>http://www.worldcongress2002.org/public/home.asp
>Warning (1/1): <!DOCTYPE> is missing.
>Warning (123/1): The attribute "LEFTMARGIN" is not allowed for the tag <BODY>.
>Warning (123/1): The attribute "TOPMARGIN" is not allowed for the tag <BODY>.
>Error (123/1): In the tag <BODY> the attribute "MARGINWIDTH" is not allowed.
>Error (123/1): In the tag <BODY> the attribute "MARGINHEIGHT" is not allowed.
>Warning (129/224): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (129/443): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (129/656): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (129/877): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (129/1086): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (131/218): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (131/418): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (131/624): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (131/829): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (131/1050): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (135/291): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (135/652): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (135/1013): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (164/5): In the tag <TD> the attribute "WIDTH" should only
>contain absolute pixel values.
>Warning (167/107): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (168/5): The attribute "BACKGROUND" is not allowed for the tag <TD>.
>Warning (168/167): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (168/453): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (168/728): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (168/1024): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (168/1313): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Warning (168/1602): The attribute "NAME" is not allowed for the tag <IMG>.
>Error (181/44): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (181/99): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (184/44): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (184/102): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (197/763): The start tag for </P> can't be found.
>Error (201/5): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (205/5): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (209/5): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (213/5): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (217/5): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
>Error (222/5): The tag <FONT> is not part of "HTML 4.0 Strict".
So the page does not specify which version of HTML it is using
(missing <!DOCTYPE>) and is not using HTML 4.0 Strict but an earlier
version.
Despite using styesheets it still uses FONT tags which is an untidy.
>
>2. As for accessibility within the Community Forum, the basics appear to
>be covered; there are alt tags on images, links separated by non-link
>elements etc
If I go to this page directly with a text only browser it appears
quite usable. Hopefully it would pass a bobby test. If the top page
of the site pointed directly to this page,
http://www.worldcongress2002.org/public/home.asp , it would be usable.
>6. As for speed, yes, it contains a lot of text and graphics but that
>does not make it impossible to read using a slow link, just slow, which
>goes with the territory with this type of forum and chat interaction.
And that is one of the reasons I use a text browser for my first scan
of a page. If I see enough to interest me I proceed. If I see too
little to indicate what the site is or how to navigate I make a
judgement about the competence of the designers and go elsewhere.
Tony
-- phone +61 2 6241 7659 mailto:me@Tony-Barry.emu.id.au http://tony-barry.emu.id.au/people/tony/index.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Sun Mar 31 2002 - 03:10:03 EST