Thanks Doug.
That's a good outcome from my bad beginning.
Cheers,
Fred
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Jacquier [mailto:dj@cisa.asn.au]
> Sent: Friday, 1 March 2002 10:05
> To: Pilcher, Fred; Chirgwin, Richard; Link
> Cc: Phil Palmer; Wallace Mcgee; Kate Dibben; Garry Putland;
> Ruth Morris
> (E-mail); brabham@ignitiondesign.com.au; Leila Henderson; Mike Vasey
> Subject: RE: [LINK] WCIT2002 Community Forum
>
>
> Thanks Fred
> As you will see from my next email, your essential point was right and
> we have learned from that.
> Cheers
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pilcher, Fred [mailto:Fred.Pilcher@act.gov.au]
> Sent: Friday, 1 March 2002 11:15 AM
> To: Doug Jacquier; Chirgwin, Richard; Link
> Cc: Phil Palmer; Wallace Mcgee; Kate Dibben; Garry Putland;
> Ruth Morris
> (E-mail); brabham@ignitiondesign.com.au; Leila Henderson; Mike Vasey
> Subject: RE: [LINK] WCIT2002 Community Forum
>
>
> Hi again Doug.
>
> You wrote:
> > If Fred's original comment had been as helpful as his second
> > there would
> > have been less temptation to 'play the man', as you put it.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Members of Link have, as long as I've been subscribed, been rightly
> critical of bad site design. My original comment presupposed
> a knowledge
> of that history and, I suppose, an understanding of what
> constitutes bad
> design. I was wrong on both counts and, particularly considering that
> you identified yourself as a new subscriber, deserve your brickbat.
>
> Sorry.
>
> Fred
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Sun Mar 31 2002 - 03:10:03 EST