RE: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues

From: Michael Skeggs (Michael.Skeggs@uk.uu.net)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 20:57:47 EST

Next message: Michael Skeggs: "[LINK] Spam blocking - effectiveness"
Previous message: Peter Batchelor: "RE: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Maybe in reply to: Tony Barry: "[LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Next in thread: Craig Sanders: "Re: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Reply: Craig Sanders: "Re: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Reply: Glen Turner: "Re: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> From: Adam Todd [mailto:at@ah.net]
> Without a carrier licence it's impossible to do unless you
> want to pay lots
> of fines.

Isn't the idea of this spread spectrum wireless that it does not need to be
licensed? Or is the fine in regard to acting as a telco without a licence?
Regards,
Michael Skeggs

Next message: Michael Skeggs: "[LINK] Spam blocking - effectiveness"
Previous message: Peter Batchelor: "RE: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Maybe in reply to: Tony Barry: "[LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Next in thread: Craig Sanders: "Re: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Reply: Craig Sanders: "Re: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Reply: Glen Turner: "Re: [LINK] 'Parasitic grid' could undermine wireless revenues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 03:10:05 EST