Yes, I am aware that Netmeeting kinda uses H323 proto, but why is it
necessary for ChatStack to use its own ports.
If Colloqui is sold down the line then the gummint should be demanding
its^H^H^Hour money back, with interest.
-- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates Contact detail at http://www.lannetlinux.comOn Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Kevin Littlejohn wrote:
> > >>> Howard Lowndes wrote > > I went to both colloqui.com and chatstack.com looking for information. > > > > There is no mention of any standards, other than for the need to be > > running M$ Netmeeting, and the ports are all oddball up around 14000+/tcp > > and 15000+/udp > > MS Netmeeting vaguely adheres to the H.323 standard for voice-over-IP. > So there's half a chance they're vaguely just re-implementing netmeeting > - in which case .au govt is funding someone to go into competition with MS - always > a good business plan. Gotta wonder whether the business plan for colloqui > involves being bought out by MS in a year, and what sort of return the .au > govt expects to see from that.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 03:10:02 EST