>Personally, I'm still amazed that they _don't_ publish the list, so those of
>us not paying the certified American filtering companies can protect
>ourselves
>by adding these url's to our own filtering software - or ISP's do the same by
>adding them to blocking lists. They demand we filter out certain pages, but
>refuse to tell us what those pages are - but they _will_ tell the overseas
>filtering companies (they claim - we can't verify they're doing that,
>either).
>How does one go about getting such a job, where review of performance is
>impossible yet the money still flows?
Totally agree.
Here we are, providing a FREE service to the US Profit Companies by sending
them data we don't want to see. IN return they SELL to us the products
that we decided to legislate a requirement to use.
Bit like the ABS demanding ISPs provide the information, but at least they
send a copy of the results to the ISP. Imagine if they asked the ISP to
PAY for the results!
Bah, typical Australian Attitude. She'll be right mate, we'll just force
people to IMPORT products, rather than EXPORT.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 03:10:06 EST