Well for a start it might just provide some clue as to what standards are
being applied.
-- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates Contact detail at http://www.lannetlinux.comOn Tue, 24 Jul 2001, David Goldstein wrote:
> --- Bernard Robertson-Dunn <brd@austarmetro.com.au> wrote: > Battle > looms over net censorship > > Caitlin Fitzsimmons > > 18 July 2001 > > Australian > ... > > The ABA has previously told Australian IT that it would not > > release details > > of censored sites because it would be "counter to the object > > of the > > scheme". Ms Graham said the Tribunal had assigned a full panel > > of three > > members to hear the case, which she believed was testimony to > > the > > importance of the case. > > > > "It does appear to be breaking new ground and it could be a > > precedent-setting case," she said. "We believe it's a serious > > case of > > considerable public importance." > > I'm very curious to know whose opinion it is that this is "a serious > case of considerable public importance." > > I guess that the EFA may consider it thus, but for the general > public??? To consider it serious. And why would the public consider > it important to get "hold of page titles and URLs" of this stuff. > Surely it's a list that can only be abused. > > Cheers > David > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger > - Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more! >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 03:10:06 EST