David,
> I guess that the EFA may consider it thus, but for the general
> public??? To consider it serious. And why would the public consider
> it important to get "hold of page titles and URLs" of this stuff.
> Surely it's a list that can only be abused.
One fine reason to want access to this information is accountability. The
government could censor anything it likes (e.g. political opponents or
activism), if it cannot be held accountable.
Felipe Rodriquez
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 03:10:06 EST