>>> =?iso-8859-1?q?David=20Goldstein?= wrote
> I guess that the EFA may consider it thus, but for the general
> public??? To consider it serious. And why would the public consider
> it important to get "hold of page titles and URLs" of this stuff.
> Surely it's a list that can only be abused.
Personally, I'm still amazed that they _don't_ publish the list, so those of
us not paying the certified American filtering companies can protect ourselves
by adding these url's to our own filtering software - or ISP's do the same by
adding them to blocking lists. They demand we filter out certain pages, but
refuse to tell us what those pages are - but they _will_ tell the overseas
filtering companies (they claim - we can't verify they're doing that, either).
How does one go about getting such a job, where review of performance is
impossible yet the money still flows?
KevinL
-- Internet techie Obsidian Consulting Group Specialising in proxy servers and traffic measuring/billing. http://www.obsidian.com.au/ darius@obsidian.com.au
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.1 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 03:10:06 EST