<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>ANU Podcasts: Law</title>
    <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>celeste.ecuyer@anu.edu.au</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T03:40:10+10:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />

    

    <item>
      <title>Do Garnaut&#8217;s targets add up?</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/do_garnauts_targets_add_up/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/do_garnauts_targets_add_up/#When:01:37:08Z</guid>
      <description>On Friday, 5 September 2008, Professor Ross Garnaut released his much awaited supplementary draft report on targets and trajectories. The report argues that Australia&#39;s mid&#45; and long&#45;term targets should be to reduce emissions net of international trading by 10 per cent from 2000 levels by 2020, and 80 per cent by m2050. This, we are told, is a proportionate contribution to the &amp;lsquo;achievable&#39; international goal of stabilising the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases at 550 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2&#45;e). This lecture,&amp;nbsp;Do Garnaut&#39;s targets add up? An analysis of the Garnaut Review&#39;s targets and trajectories recommendations, explored whether the proposed national targets are consistent with the goal of stabilising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations at 550 ppm CO2&#45;e and whether the risks associated with his &#39;overshoot&#39; strategy have been fully explored.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Economics, Environment, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, ANU College of Law, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-12-02T01:37:08+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The 14th Annual  Lions Oratory Competition 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/the_14th_annual_lions_oratory_competition_2008/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/the_14th_annual_lions_oratory_competition_2008/#When:02:06:30Z</guid>
      <description>The 14th Annual Lions Oratory Competition saw selected ANU students from across the University present eight minute orations to convince the judges and the audience that they deserved to win the ANU Lions Oratory Trophy and prizes totaling $3,000 in cash.&amp;nbsp;The event was hoseted&amp;nbsp;by Esther Sainsbury, last years winner of the 2007 Lions Oratory Competition and judged by an esteemed panel of public&#45;speaking experts. The oratory saw speakers addressing a range of subjects incorporating the Lions&#39; messages of truth, righteousness, peace, love and non&#45;violence &#45; the core values of all major religions.Prizes included:
First prize &#45; The ManikKam Reddy Award: $1,500Second prize: $800Third prize: $500Donated by the Lions Club of Canberra Woden
People&#39;s Choice Award: $400Donated by the Australian National University and the Lions Club of Canberra Woden</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Humanities, Society &amp; Culture, Student Life, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU College of Business and Economics, ANU College of Law, ANU College of Medicine and Health Sciences, ANU College of Science, University, Arts and Social Sciences, Asia and the Pacific, Business and Economics, Campus Life, Law, Medicine and Life Science</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-09-24T02:06:30+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Modern War &amp; Modern Law</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/modern_war/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/modern_war/#When:05:31:00Z</guid>
      <description>Warfare has become a legal institution. Law organises and disciplines
the military, defines the battle&#45;space, privileges killing the enemy,
and offers a common language to debate the legitimacy of waging war &#45;
down to the tactics of particular battle. At the same time, law is no
longer a matter of firm distinctions &#45; combatant and non&#45;combatant, war
and peace. It has become a flexible and strategic partner for both the
military and for humanitarians seeking to restrain the violence of
warfare. The relationship between modern war and modern law is made all
the more complex by today&#39;s asymmetric conflicts, and by the loss of a
shared vision about what the law means and how it should be applied.
In
this lecture Professor Kennedy explores the ways in which good
legal arguments can make people lose their moral compass and sense of
responsibility for the violence of war.
Professor Kennedy&#39;s visit was organised by the Asia Pacific Centre for Military Law.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, International Law, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, ANU College of Law, Asia and the Pacific, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-04T05:31:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Socratic Forum: That Canberra is Taking Too Much Power from The States</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/socratic_forum/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/socratic_forum/#When:23:25:00Z</guid>
      <description>In this debate, ANU plays host to a number of influential public
figures including ACT Attorney General Simon Corbell; Dr Clive
Hamilton, The Australia Institute; Professor Peter Bailey, ANU; Channel
10&#39;s Political Commentator, Paul Bongiorno; Karen Middleton, SBS; and
Charles Sampford from the Institute of Ethics Governance and Law.
Speakers  contest a vigorous debate on issues surrounding Commonwealth&#45;State Relations in Australia.
The Socratic Forum is part of a national discussion series aimed at
encouraging frank, non&#45;partisan and open debate on issues of importance
to the Australian community.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Economics, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, Society &amp; Culture, ANU College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-13T23:25:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Future of the United Nations Security Council</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/future_un_security_council/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/future_un_security_council/#When:01:33:00Z</guid>
      <description>2008 has already brought major new challenges for diplomats. The
situations in Kenya and Pakistan underline the depths of the problems
in Africa and elsewhere. The Security Council and UN peacekeepers were
already at historically high levels of activity in 2006&#45;2007. Can they
take on any more? NATO, the EU, the US, the Nordics, and Australia and
New Zealand also seem to be stretched to the limit. Perhaps it is time
for some searching analysis of whether the current machinery for
international collective security is up to the challenges of the 21st
Century. The UN Security Council is at the heart of that system. But is
it living up to its potential? Can it be reformed and what kinds of
reforms might improve the overall outlook? What does the future hold?
These are all important questions at a time when Australia is exploring
new options for an enhanced multilateral role.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-19T01:33:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Devil&#8217;s Advocate Series: Debate 3 &#45; Guarding Australia (Citizenship, Security &amp; Terrorism)</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/devils_advocate_guarding_australia/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/devils_advocate_guarding_australia/#When:23:58:01Z</guid>
      <description>Part of a series of public debates hosted by the Australian National
University and The Canberra Times. Join a diverse panel of ANU experts
in a lively discussion of the major issues driving this election.  The Dr Mohamed Haneef case continues to be a thorn in the Federal
Government&amp;rsquo;s side, as more questions are raised about the way in which
his visa was removed. Now overseas doctors are said to be &amp;lsquo;boycotting&amp;rsquo;
Australia because of the incident. Are Australia&amp;rsquo;s anti&#45;terror measures
doing the nation good or harm? How do both major parties plan to keep
Australian&amp;rsquo;s secure? And how do they differ on what it means to be
Australian in the first place?</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, University, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-11-13T23:58:01+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Devil&#8217;s Advocate Series: Debate 2 &#45; The States of the Nation (Federation&#8217;s Future)</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/devils_advocate_the_states_nation/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/devils_advocate_the_states_nation/#When:00:06:01Z</guid>
      <description>Part of a series of public debates hosted by The Australian National
University and The Canberra Times.&amp;nbsp;A diverse panel of ANU experts in a
lively discussion of the major issues driving this election. Debate 2 &amp;ndash;
The States of the Nation &amp;ndash; is moderated by Andrew Fraser.
What is the future of federation? What impact is the Federal
Government&amp;rsquo;s foray into water, health, education and Indigenous Affairs
having? And how will these shifts affect the outcome of the election?</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, University, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-11-08T00:06:01+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Devil&#8217;s Advocate Series: Debate 1 &#45; Work Choice The IR Battleground</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/devils_advocate_work_choice/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/devils_advocate_work_choice/#When:01:43:00Z</guid>
      <description>A series of public debates hosted by the Australian National University
and The Canberra Times.&amp;nbsp;A diverse panel of ANU experts in a lively
discussion of the major issues driving this election. Each debate is
moderated by a senior journalist from The Canberra Times.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Policy &amp; Political Science, University, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-10-31T01:43:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Coercive Reconciliation: Stabilise, Normalise, Exit Aboriginal Australia</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/coercive_reconciliation/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/coercive_reconciliation/#When:02:52:00Z</guid>
      <description>On 21 June 2007 Prime Minister John Howard and Minister for
Indigenous Affairs Mal Brough declared a &amp;lsquo;national emergency&amp;rsquo; in
relation to child sexual abuse in the Northern Territory. In an
unprecedented set of actions, the Commonwealth has taken direct control
of communities, overriding the authority of both the NT Government and
local community organisations in the name of creating safe and healthy
environments for children.
In this public lecture, Dr Hinkson,
Professor Behrendt, Ms Watson and Professor Altman contributors to the
first book about the intervention Coercive Reconciliation: Stabilise, Normalise, Exit Aboriginal Australia assess the intervention from the perspectives of human rights, welfare
and land rights reforms, Indigenous representation and reconciliation,
and the recognition of cultural diversity.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, University, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-10-16T02:52:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Weapons of Mass Destruction: Maintaining the Rage</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/weapons_of_mass_destruction_maintaining_the_rage/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/weapons_of_mass_destruction_maintaining_the_rage/#When:05:56:00Z</guid>
      <description>The lecture was a joint presentation between The Australian National University and The Lowy Institute for International Policy.  Over the last decade there has been a serious, and dangerous, loss of
momentum and direction in disarmament and non&#45;proliferation efforts.
The Chemical Weapons Convention &amp;ndash; for whose conclusion and
implementation John Gee worked so tirelessly and brilliantly &#45; shows
what is achievable. Nuclear weapons cannot be uninvented, but they can
be outlawed &#45; as chemical and biological weapons have been &#45; and their
use made unthinkable. But that will require from the world&#39;s
decision&#45;makers an intelligent understanding of present dangers,
creative new policy thinking, and above all an end to hypocrisy and
double standards.
Dr John Gee Memorial Lecture
Dr John Gee served with distinction as an Australian diplomat in a
number of countries. His greatest contribution, however, was in the
field of disarmament, where he had a particular interest in chemical
weapons. After a period as a Commissioner on the United Nations Special
Commission on Iraq following the first Gulf War, he became Deputy
Director&#45;General of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons in The Hague, serving there until 2003. In recognition of his
achievements, Dr Gee was made a member of the Order of Australia in
January 2007.
&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Policy &amp; Political Science, University, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-08-23T05:56:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The New System of International Justice in the Wake of the Criminal Court</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/international_justice_criminal_court/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/international_justice_criminal_court/#When:00:17:00Z</guid>
      <description>The International Criminal Court (ICC) is the first permanent judicial
body with jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war
crimes. The ICC has recently embarked on its first prosecution: the
trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo for crimes allegedly committed in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. Arrest warrants have been issued for
individuals in relation to the situation in Darfur, Sudan, and for
crimes committed in Uganda. An investigation into crimes allegedly
committed in the Central African Republic has also commenced. As the
ICC has become operational, further countries have solidified their
support for the Court and recognised its role in the promotion of
global peace and security and the rule of law.
In this public lecture, the ICC&amp;rsquo;s first prosecutor, Mr. Luis
Moreno&#45;Ocampo,&amp;nbsp;addresses the new system of international criminal
justice being spearheaded by the Court.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, ANU College of Law, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-08-21T00:17:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Contracting Cultures: Indigenous Intellectual Property and the Creative Commons</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/contracting_cultures/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/contracting_cultures/#When:00:34:00Z</guid>
      <description>In intellectual property, there has been much interest of late in the
creative use of contract law &#45; especially with the development of the
Creative Commons.
By necessity, Indigenous communities have been pioneers in the creative
use of contract law. In light of the glacial progress to reform
legislative regimes and international treaties to protect traditional
knowledge, Indigenous peoples have been forced to make creative use of
contract law in order to protect their cultural interests. Rather than
employing contract law to keep material in the public domain,
Indigenous communities have used creative contracts to safeguard
traditional knowledge.
Creative contracts have been a means to ward&#45;off free riders, copycats, and bio&#45;pirates.
In the field of copyright law, contractual terms have been used to
provide protection for economic and moral interests in Indigenous
intellectual property. Contracts have also been used to deal with the
commission, licensing, and resale of Indigenous art. In the area of
industrial property, Indigenous communities have relied upon contract
law to negotiate benefits arising out of the exploitation of patented
inventions, trademarks, and confidential information. In the field of
access to genetic resources, Indigenous land use agreements can include
benefit&#45;sharing agreements in respect of bioprospecting.</description>
      <dc:subject>Seminar, Indigenous Studies, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, ANU College of Law, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-07-19T00:34:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>US Military Commissions &amp; International Humanitarian Law in the &#8216;War on Terrorism&#8217;</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/us_military_commissions/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/us_military_commissions/#When:04:34:00Z</guid>
      <description>David Hicks, accused of being an enemy combatant in the war on
terrorism and held at Guantanamo Bay, has become a household name in
Australia. Reports of his case have appeared regularly in the media,
often including comments from his defence lawyer Major Michael Mori of
the US Marine Corps.
In this lecture Major Mori
outlines the proposed trial proceedings for US military commissions and
discuss whether or not the rules and procedures will accord with the
minimum requirements mandated under International Humanitarian Law. He
also considers whether the proceedings are able to provide for the
appropriate level of independent checks and balances of an established
justice system.
This lecture was sponsored by&amp;nbsp; the Australian Red Cross and the Centre for International and Public Law.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, ANU College of Law, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-08-18T04:34:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Confessions of an Erstwhile Land Rights Advocate</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/erstwhile_land_rights_advocate/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/erstwhile_land_rights_advocate/#When:05:54:00Z</guid>
      <description>Late in his term on the High Court, Justice McHugh, one of the
majority in the Mabo decision and one of the dissentients in Wik,
expressed criticism of the &quot;costly and time&#45;consuming&quot; native title
system. He thought it was unable to fairly evaluate the competing legal
rights of landholders and native&#45;title holders.
In this lecture presented by the National Centre for Indigenous
Studies and the Centre for International and Public Law, Father Frank
Brennan argues that the issue now is not the legitimacy of land rights
but determining the cut&#45;off point for recognising native&#45;title rights
when other parties also have rights over the same land. He also argues
the importance of matching the remaining native&#45;title rights with the
real, rather than imagined, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
aspirations.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, Indigenous Studies, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, ANU College of Law, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-07-27T05:54:00+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Mabo Case: Its Significance for Australia and the World</title>
      <link>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/mabo_case/</link>
      <guid>http://www.anu.edu.au/discoveranu/content/podcasts/mabo_case/#When:06:03:01Z</guid>
      <description>A judicial revolution occurred in 1992 when the High Court discarded
the doctrine of terra nullius in the Mabo case. The ruling had
repercussions for Indigenous peoples within Australia and around the
world, especially in Canada, New Zealand, and the United States.
In this lecture presented by the Centre for Aboriginal Economic
Policy Research (CAEPR), ANU College of Arts&amp;nbsp;and Social Sciences,
Professor Peter Russell considers the background and consequences of
the Mabo case, contextualising it within the international struggle of
Indigenous peoples to overcome their colonized status. He weaves
together a historical narrative of Eddie Mabo&amp;rsquo;s life with an account of
the legal and ideological premises of European imperialism, outlining
the implications of the Mabo ruling for judicial, constitutional and
Indigenous politics.</description>
      <dc:subject>Public Lecture, History &amp; Archeology, Indigenous Studies, Law, Justice &amp; Law Enforcement, Policy &amp; Political Science, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Arts and Social Sciences, Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-03-23T06:03:01+10:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>