Indigenous Wellbeing
Wellbeing and Indigenous Australians
Wednesday, 10 June 2009
In recent years there has been an increasing recognition of the limits of GDP as a measure of 'progress' and a growing emphasis on notions of wellbeing, satisfaction, or quality of life. A number of alternative measures of national progress have emerged both in Australia and overseas, with some of the better known including the 'Australian Unity Wellbeing Index', the 'Genuine Progress Indicator' and the 'Happy Planet Index'. In common with these measures, economist Amartya Sen has rejected the notion that development can be measured purely by changes in personal income or GDP.
Aboriginal Poverty: What's social capital got to do with it?
Wednesday, 1 October 2008
In this seminar I present some initial findings from a project entitled, 'The Social Context of Indigenous Poverty'. The research involved a series of interviews with Aboriginal people in urban and rural SE Australia on issues of poverty, social capital and social exclusion. In the paper I draw together Aboriginal perspectives on the meaning of poverty to reflect on the relevance of social capital concepts for understanding Aboriginal economic disadvantage.
Please note: This seminar is available in both Streaming Audio and MP3 formats.
'Yo, turn around and look at Yolngu people, we are here': Indigenous cultural festivals and wellbeing
Wednesday, 24 September 2008
This paper is a part of a larger ARC Linkage project, with the Telstra Foundation, that examines the immediate and longer-term impacts of selected Indigenous festivals on community wellbeing. In recent years wellbeing is a concept that has gained salience and urgency, indeed it has become standard currency in economic and political models of welfare and development. Concerns have been expressed about the indicators of wellbeing and the lack of recongnition that notions of health and wellbeing and socio-economic inclusion and exclusion are culturally constructed.
Ongoing poverty amongst Indigenous households
Issue Brief 8 / 1996
In the 1990s Indigenous households continue to experience high levels of poverty in comparison with other Australian households.
Characteristics of Indigenous households
Indigenous households are complex social and economic units. They differ in important ways from other Australian households:
Income poverty among Indigenous families with children: estimates from the 1991 Census
Issue Brief 9 / 1996
Indigenous children and income poverty
Child poverty and employment issues are continuing concerns of government. This study confirms the commonly held view, that income poverty is much higher in the Indigenous than the non-Indigenous population.
Indigenous Australians and the socioeconomic status of urban neighbourhoods
Issue Brief 6 / 1996
A comparison of the 1976 and 1991 Census data shows that an increasing proportion of Indigenous people are living in the low socioeconomic status or relatively poor neighbourhoods within Australian cities, while the number of Indigenous people living in more wealthy urban areas is in decline (Figure 1).
Indigenous Australians and the rules of the social security system: Universalism, apppropriateness, and justice
Discussion Paper 212 / 2001
Abstract:
Noel Pearson has recently argued that inclusion in a 'passive' welfare system, over the last thirty years, has been to the detriment of Aboriginal society. This paper approaches the inclusion of Aboriginal people in the social security system from a slightly different perspective, while taking seriously Pearson's concerns.
Is welfare dependency 'welfare poison'? An assessment of Noel Pearson's proposals for Aboriginal welfare reform
Discussion Paper 213 / 2001
Abstract:
Aboriginal lawyer, activist and social commentator Noel Pearson has recently argued that the current mode of delivery of welfare services to Aboriginal people is deeply antithetical to their interests and wellbeing. Central to his scheme for policy change and improved welfare outcomes are two core propositions.
Indigenous families and the welfare system: The Kuranda community case study, Stage Two
Discussion Paper 216 / 2001
Abstract:
This discussion paper presents the results from the second year (Stage Two) of the Kuranda community case study for the project on Indigenous families and the welfare system. Twenty-nine key reference people were interviewed about the factors influencing the delivery of welfare income by government to Indigenous families for the care of children.
Indigenous families and the welfare system: The Yuendumu community case study, Stage Two
Discussion Paper 217 / 2001
Abstract:
In 1998, CAEPR commenced research for the Children and Welfare Project, as negotiated with the Indigenous Policy Unit (IPU) of the Department of Family and Community Services (DFACS). The project aims to provide a longitudinal study into the factors influencing the service delivery of social security income support payments to Indigenous families for the care of their children.
User login
|
Page last updated: 01 January 1970 Please direct all enquiries to: caepr.web@anu.edu.au Page authorised by Director, CAEPR |
|
Contact the CAEPR Administrator on Ph: 02) 6125 0587
The Australian National University — CRICOS Provider Number 00120C |
